*All Data for the post is through 3/12/2014*

*All Data for the post is through 3/12/2014*

We're back with more visuals! You might note that we made some upgrades. The logos are smaller, and we converted the offense and defense ratings to point margin. As always, we can't do this without your awesome feedback, so please it coming.

### Season Ratings

*The Season Ratings graph shows the value of each team's offense and defense to their overall adjusted point margin per game. It's expressed in points per game, with offense on the side and defense on the bottom. Greater than zero numbers mean better than league average offensive/defensive unit. The higher the better the offense, the more to the right the better the defense.*

### Adjusted Win% vs Actual Win%

*The Adjusted Win% versus Actual Win% graph intends to show how much the schedule affects the actual win total of each team. A team on the center black line represents a team whose record actually reflects the strength of that team. Teams above that line are stronger than their current record. Teams below that line are weaker than their record. *

### Pace

*The Pace graph shows the typical number of offensive possesions in a game for each team. Faster Pace (to the right) means more points and larger point margins per game. Slower pace (to the left) means fewer points and smaller point margins.*

### Strength of Schedule

*The Strength of Schedule graph shows how a team's schedule and opponents affect its actual point margin per game. Teams with a negative point margin (to the left of the vertical axis) have played a tougher schedule. Teams with a positive point margin (the right of the vertical axis) have played an easier schedule.*

And why don't you guys just use adjusted W/L or something similar for the power rankings, their way too subject to recency bias based on whatever formula that is. Which one correlates better with future performance? I bet it's the unweighted one.

One other note, has anyone else noticed how these guys' early season graphs tended to show a non-1 slope for the W/L vs. adj. W/L; the winning teams were called lucky and the losing teams unlucky, but now it looks like a pretty 1 to 1 relationship (probably because they have a regression to the mean constant in there whose impact becomes weaker as the season progresses. Someone calculated the constants for W/L and point differential to prove how much better point differential is, maybe a Wages commenter, but I gave up after some cursory searching of the interwebs).

That would make it easy to show, say, the Pacers fans that called you haters how unlikely they were to maintain their early season for, because watch 1996, and see how, eventually, most teams regress back towards the line.

16.5 wins might already be out of reach since they have to win 2 of their last 16 games and Boston is the only team they play in the home stretch that isn't scrambling for playoff seeding.

The Philly over might turn out to be one of the worst gambling losses ever- given that they had to go 2-33 to beat it.